‘Showgirls’: The Gratuitous, Surreal Bomb That Was Maybe Brilliant

MyNews newsroom brief · 8h ago · 1 min read · via nytimes.com

The reception to Paul Verhoeven’s lurid 1995 melodrama starring Elizabeth Berkley, Kyle MacLachlan and Gina Gershon was humiliating, but it’s since become a thought-provoking camp favorite.

The reappraisal of "Showgirls" is a fascinating case study in how a film's reputation can shift over time. When it was first released in 1995, the movie was widely panned by critics and audiences alike, with many considering it a catastrophic failure. The film's explicit content, convoluted plot, and over-the-top performances were seen as a misfire, and it became a symbol of Hollywood excess.

However, as the years have passed, "Showgirls" has developed a cult following and is now often cited as a camp classic. This reevaluation speaks to the changing attitudes towards film and popular culture. The movie's inadvertent humor, bizarre plot twists, and memorable performances have made it a thought-provoking and entertaining watch. The film's director, Paul Verhoeven, has even embraced its cult status, acknowledging the movie's surreal and subversive qualities.

As the film industry continues to grapple with issues of artistic merit, cultural relevance, and audience expectations, the story of "Showgirls" serves as a reminder that initial failures can ultimately be recontextualized as successes. What's next to watch is how other films that were initially met with scorn or indifference might similarly be reevaluated in the years to come. Will other cult classics emerge, and what does this say about our evolving tastes and values as moviegoers?

Originally reported by nytimes.com. MyNews adds analysis for general news readers.

Originally reported by nytimes.com. MyNews curates and briefs the general news stories that matter. Our editorial policy →
Get the daily general signal:

More from MyNews

Part of the eCorp network