Shittu 'robbed' - are AI boxing judges the answer?

The controversy surrounding Dimeji Shittu's loss in the Commonwealth Games final has sparked a renewed debate about the role of technology in sports judging. The claims that Shittu was "robbed" suggest that many believe human error played a significant role in the outcome, and that an alternative method of judging could have produced a different result. This is not the first time concerns about inconsistent or biased judging have been raised in boxing, and it is likely that the issue will continue to be a topic of discussion.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in sports judging is not a new concept, and it has already been implemented in various forms in different sports. In boxing, AI-powered systems have been used to help judges score fights more accurately, by analyzing data such as punch speed, power, and frequency. While AI is not a panacea for all judging errors, it could potentially help reduce the impact of human bias and inconsistency. However, implementing AI in boxing judging would require significant investment and testing to ensure that the technology is reliable and fair.

As the debate about AI-assisted judging in boxing continues, it will be interesting to see how the sport's governing bodies respond to calls for change. The Commonwealth Games Federation and the International Boxing Association will likely face pressure to review their judging processes and consider the role that technology could play in improving fairness and accuracy. In the short term, fans and athletes will be watching to see how these organizations address the concerns raised by Shittu's loss, and whether any changes are made to the judging system for future competitions.

Originally reported by bbc.co.uk. MyNews adds analysis for general news readers.