Public executions in the US stopped nearly a century ago - why are they resuming now?

The announcement that the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will be livestreamed marks a significant shift in the approach to capital punishment in the US. Public executions have not been carried out in the country for nearly a century, and this move has sparked debate among experts and the general public. The decision to livestream the execution raises questions about the motivations behind it and the potential impact on the public's perception of capital punishment.

The US has a complex history with capital punishment, with opinions on the matter varying widely across different states and regions. While some argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, others see it as an inhumane practice that does not align with modern values. The fact that the Pentagon has decided to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, a convicted terrorist, suggests that officials may be seeking to make a statement or send a message. However, experts warn that this approach may be misreading the mood of the country, and could potentially backfire.

As the debate around capital punishment continues, it will be important to watch how the public responds to the livestreaming of Nidal Hasan's execution. Will it spark a renewed debate about the use of capital punishment in the US, or will it be seen as a necessary measure in the case of a convicted terrorist? The reaction of human rights groups, lawmakers, and the general public will be crucial in determining the implications of this decision, and whether it marks a turning point in the country's approach to capital punishment.

Originally reported by bbc.co.uk. MyNews adds analysis for general news readers.